🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard women from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last year, requiring authorities to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its focus on gender equality weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action proposed by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked widespread outcry both inside the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority majority, the head of state could possibly return the legislation for additional review if he holds concerns.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional principles, "considering state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could influence similar discussions in additional member states